Post by Anon Mous on Nov 14, 2019 23:33:14 GMT -5
I do get what you're saying, but that was kind of my point. The question posed what game universe, you would want to live in (or in this case, visit), not what game. It was worded this way to add a new level thought to it, because games with chronology you would have to take the whole chronology into account. The good and the bad. Flying Vane would be really cool to visit, but it came down in the first Lunar and didn't get back up in the second, so that's out. This would however offer for a certain leeway for something like say the Mega Man and Mega Man X series taken as their own universes. And of course one could take the Wild Arms games each as their own universe, because each game appears to be an alternate reality. Otherwise this discussion just becomes a case of what is your favorite game and time period, which isn't what I was going for. That being said, there is quite a bit of concurrent story telling in the PS timeline, so I would say that the exception that could be made is that you could choose the game as long as the destination wasn't acted upon by another game. For instance you could choose a location in 2, as long as 4 and 3 don't, like, destroy it or something (since the timelines appear to mainly go 4, 1, 2, 4, 3 with a few other minor overlaps). This was partially an exercise in thinking about some of the aftermath of some of our favorite games and series.